Lanchester luxury

Often thought luxury cars too big. Lanchester showed 65 years ago that you could have a small luxury saloon, as well-appointed as a big one, just as quiet and every bit as classy. That was when Aston Martins were 2litres and Jaguars a bit big at 3½. Cars fitted roads and 200mph was what they used to do at Daytona Beach. Lancia Aprilias handled beautifully; you didn’t need big cars with huge engines.
Automotive News Europe’s Paul McVeigh says competition for luxury car sales is going to be decided by who does the best small premium cars. “Current No. 1 BMW believes its new front-wheel-drive architecture will give it a competitive edge against Audi and Mercedes-Benz.” BMW will go front wheel drive in its next 1-series. The current 1-series is rear wheel drive, but it has not a lot of legroom in the back so it is likely to follow the Mini and go front-drive.
BMW’s fwd architecture, known as ULK (somebody at BMW might tell us why ULK) is likely to be key. BMW executives hear complaints from traditional zealots that fwd dilutes BMW's rear-wheel-drive heritage. Klaus Draeger, BMW's head of purchasing, who helped create UKL when he was head of r&d, said that by 2020 it expects to make a lot of fwd models. Automotive News quoted him: "We are entering into new segments and getting new customers who learn you can drive very well with front-wheel drive.”
BMW’s Concept Active Tourer shown at Paris in September previewed BMW's first major model with UKL. A production version is due next September as a rival to Mercedes B class and Volkswagen Golf Plus. It's not greenery yallery to look askance at over-large cars. They're fine in America or Russia but there is a place here for the compact, refined, manageable and medium-sized.

Luddite IAM

Anybody in 1960 would have been, at best, cautious about landing aircraft in fog. Yet blind landings are now routine, pilotless aircraft roam the skies, and the Institute of Advanced Motorists (IAM) looks Luddite over driverless cars. Two people in five, the IAM says, would never have one and, if you believe the poll, most don’t even think they're a good idea.

Well, of course they don’t. Any more than airline passengers believed that a keen chap at the front of their BEA Trident was better than a pesky machine.

It took decades to convince passengers they were safer with clever gadgets than pilots who couldn’t see where they were going. It may be a decade or two before driverless cars, but satellite navigation and computers, not even invented when the Trident’s avionics did the job, have put the technology in place. Driverless cars are running. They’ve done hundreds of thousands of miles.

The 1960s Trident had an automatic blind landing system developed by Hawker Siddeley and Smiths Aircraft Instruments, which guided aircraft during approach, flare, touchdown and even roll-out from the landing runway. It enabled a Trident to perform the first automatic landing by a civil airliner in scheduled passenger service on 10 June 1965. The first genuinely blind landing in scheduled passenger service was on 4 November 1966.

The incentive was commercial. Airlines wanted to fly even when it was foggy. There will come a time somewhere, America, China perhaps, when a motorway will have driverless cars and trucks. It will run beautifully and safely. IAM members will be left on their own, driving themselves on minor roads, feeling their old-fashioned archaic way, very slowly.

McLaren Can-Am again


McLaren confirmed plans at the American Grand Prix to make 12Cs for racing. It showed a concept at Pebble Beach and while Andrew Kirkaldy, Managing Director of McLaren GT explained that it had been a one-off design study, the reaction was remarkable. “It is a real testament to the performance and results of the McLaren GT customer teams this year, still only in the debut competitive season, that there is such a strong demand for this type of track-day special.”

It won’t be a road car like the one Bruce McLaren planned. See http://www.dovepublishing.co.uk/2012/11/mclaren-m6gt-prototype.html

The limited edition track special, “pays tribute to Bruce McLaren and Denny Hulme who successfully raced a series of McLaren models in the Can-Am series, claiming a string of championships between them.” Amazingly the new car looks a lot like the old one. How prescient Bruce McLaren turns out to be. McLaren GT, the racing car manufacturing part of the group, will produce no more than 30 of the 12C GT Can-Am Edition. The ultimate track car it will not be subject to the strict racing regulations. Each will have an unrestricted version of the 3.8litre twin-turbo V8 engine with unique calibration to provide 630bhp, making it the most powerful 12C yet produced.

The dramatic appearance is dominated by a big carbon fibre wing, part of “a unique high downforce aerodynamic package which has been honed by McLaren Racing using Formula 1 technology and simulation, offering an increase in downforce by 30 per cent.” More carbon fibre differentiates it from the GT3 racing version. Door mirror mounts and covers, engine cover vents, side radiator intake vanes, sill covers and badges complete the appearance. The 12C GT Can-Am Edition has black satin-finished forged lightweight racing alloy wheels and with Pirelli racing tyres. It also has a full FIA-approved race-specification rollcage, two black race seats, six-point harnesses, and a McLaren GT steering wheel. Its shape and grip comes from the McLaren MP4-24 Formula 1 car.

And for gentleman racers there is, “an integrated motorsport air conditioning system incorporated in the bespoke lightweight carbon fibre dashboard. And if they really want to play racers buyers can have bespoke support packages from McLaren GT. An optional extra on the price of £375,000.

Beware

If Camden Council, The Guardian and the Lib-Dems agree on something it is almost certainly restrictive, dirigiste and mistaken. They are campaigning for 20mph speed limits. The European Citizen’s Initiative is praising councils calling for 20mph, “for residential streets with populations,” and no, I don’t know what that means either. Sounds like the woolly thinking of self-serving populists.

Nobody is against measures that reduce casualties yet the overwhelming evidence is that simply posting notices and passing laws do not always work. As recently as August the Department of Transport said casualties in 20mph zones had gone up, while those on 30mph roads had gone down. Portsmouth brought in a blanket 20mph limit in 2007. The numbers of killed and injured went up from 79 to 143.

The fact is that drivers don’t pay attention and pedestrians are complacent in “Twenty’s Plenty” zones. The behaviour of neither is commendable but laying down a law is not going to change things. Let’s go instead for what works, and the 85 percentile rule by and large does. Speed limits based on what 85 per cent of traffic thinks is about right, means that 85 per cent of it complies and the 15 per cent that don’t can be weeded out and punished. It is practical, it has been the rule since urban speed limits were brought in under the 1930 Road Traffic Act, and despite increasing traffic ever since, casualties have been steadily decreasing. We must have been doing something right. Let us not allow Camden Council, The Guardian and the Lib-Dems to make a mess now.
A 20mph zone for a 1933 Vauxhall Light Six. Does anybody recognise the road? It looks like Rest-and-be-Thankful (on which restorative work seems to be once again delayed) but it might be somewhere in Wales. I doubt our family Vauxhall of the time HS 8635 if my memory serves me, ever made it to Campbeltown but if it had, this is the road it would have taken.

AC cars

Almost as though nothing much had happened since 1939, in 1945 AC Cars at Thames Ditton restarted manufacturing the same sort of car as it had before the war. It used the aluminium single overhead camshaft 1991cc wet liner 6-cylinder, designed in 1919 by John Weller. The engine had been shown at the first London Motor Show following what used to be called the Great War. The post-Second World War AC 2 Litre had half-elliptic leaf springs, a stout chassis and it was largely hand-made on old machine tools. It was just as well the car-starved market of the time was not choosy.

It said a great deal for AC that the old design had lasted so long. The rather lugubrious saloon, in which Weller’s engine was installed, was obviously not long for the automotive mainstream. The headlamps were sunk into the wings and the radiator grille curled, otherwise there was little to distinguish it from 1930s counterparts. It held its own only so long as cars remained in short supply. Once the market returned to normal it was no longer competitive.
AC had been essentially a sports car manufacturer so, with the 2-seater market once again in view, it responded to an approach from John Tojeiro. His designs for sports-racing cars were working well in British amateur racing. The formula he followed was simple, not to say simplistic, owing something in its conception to the BMW 328 of the 1930s. Tojeiro’s ladder-type frame was in the shape of an H, with two 3in (7.6cm) diameter parallel tubes joined by a cross-tube in the middle, with independent suspension mounted on welded fabrications at both ends. The body style was cribbed, without much alteration and certainly no acknowledgement, from a contemporary Ferrari. The result was the AC Ace.
It was an instant success. The frame was stiff, the handling spectacularly good for 1953 - it would still be commendable ten years later - and a coupe version, the Aceca was added in 1955. By a process of steady evolution an excellent, intuitive design improved. When disc brakes became available they were included; this was not a preserved undeveloped design, although a top speed only just over 100mph (160.1kph) did not make the best of the exemplary road holding. As an alternative to the old 102bhp Weller engine, in 1958 AC offered the Bristol (née BMW 328) 2litre with 125bhp, giving both Ace and Aceca well over 115mph (185kph) and taking the Ace into the connoisseur class.
The Ace-Bristol lasted until 1961. Bristol, perhaps unwisely, discontinued the engine and as an alternative AC offered a rather unsatisfactory modified Ford Zephyr pushrod of 170bhp. It had scant refinement, great weight and was unworthy of a hand-made premium priced, well proportioned 2-seater. Its only virtue was to keep things going until something better turned up.
Help was at hand. Led by the colourful Texan Carroll Hall Shelby (1923-2012), the prototype AC Cobra of 1962 was basically an Ace chassis altered to accommodate a Ford V8 engine. It had stout wheel arches to cope with wider tyres and more than twice the horse power of the Ace Zephyr.
For bravura, few cars could match a well-tuned Cobra. There were two models, one with a 4.2 or 4.7litre V8; then from the middle of 1965 a 7litre giving up to 345bhp in road trim and a top speed around 145mph 233.3kph). It could manage a standing quarter-mile in under 13sec.
Such performance made demands on a chassis so more changes were wrought. One of the first was rack and pinion steering. There had been a tendency of racks and pinions to lock-up at inconvenient moments, so until that was curbed many designs carried over from the 1930s continued with drop-arms and drag links. The Cobra's suspension had to be brought up to date as well, combined coil spring and dampers with wishbones, replacing the transverse leaf springs.
The Cobra went under a lot of names. Sometimes the AC part was dropped altogether and it was known as a Shelby Cobra, a Shelby American or sometimes a Ford Cobra. AC engaged Tojeiro again 1958 to design a space-framed, de Dion axled car for racing. There was another stretched Cobra, for which Frua produced a lookalike body to its Maserati Mistrale, calling it simply the 428. It was fast, around 140mph (225.3kph) stylish but not very successful. Only 86 were made, a survivor the firm's sole exhibit for years at the London Motor Show long after production ceased. The design had really outgrown the proprietors, the staid deeply conservative rather dour Hurlocks, who had bought the company in 1930. You felt they neither understood nor really quite approved of the cult status the Cobra had achieved. It had not been what they had in mind at all. All that noise and speed was scarcely gentlemanly.

From: Sports Car Classics: Original road tests, feature articles and motoring columns by Eric Dymock. Amazon £3.08 or $4.99. Pictured 1) AC Ace 2) AC Ace-Bristol 3) AC Aceca and 4) 39PH the Le Mans Ac Cobra track tested by Eric Dymock and featured in Sports Car Classics.


Bright Spark?

Some press releases are too good to ignore. Back in August the Fédération Internationale de l'Automobile (FIA) agreed to licence commercial rights of its Formula E Championship to, “a consortium of international investors, Formula E Holdings Ltd (FEH).” Formula E is for electric “Formula” cars, presumably open-wheelers. “It represents a vision for the future of the motor industry over the coming decades.”

Well, maybe. That's what Camille Jenatzy (right) thought in 1899.

Behind FEH is London-based entrepreneur Enrique Bañuelos, CEO and shareholder is former MEP and racing team owner Alejandro Agag. Also associated are Lord Drayson, Labour’s old Minister for Science, and Eric Barbaroux, Chairman of the French electric automotive company "Electric Formula". Demonstrations of Formula E cars start next year, followed by a championship in 2014 with an objective of 10 teams and 20 drivers. The races "will be ideally" staged in the heart of the world’s leading cities, around their main landmarks. Well, maybe.

With luminaries like Drayson and an ex MEP involved, they'll be looking for subsidies from greenies. Paying customers would never make an electric grand prix commercial, yet expect FEH to be awash with taxpayer cash. And expect more announcements like: FOUNDATION OF SPARK RACING TECHNOLOGY. OFFICIAL SUPPLIER OF THE FIA FORMULA E CHAMPONSHIP. PARIS, 12th November 2012: Frédéric Vasseur is pleased to announce the birth of Spark Racing Technology, a company dedicated to the creation and assembly of cars participating in the FIA World Championship Formula E. E for electric, exciting, efficiency, environment, and last but not least, a new era. Well, maybe.

Spark Racing Technology will be part of a newly founded consortium whose purpose is to design the most efficient electric cars possible, in regard to mechanical, electrical, electronics and engine. Frédéric Vasseur is proud to announce that McLaren is among the key players in the said consortium. The collaboration of Spark Racing Technology with a major car manufacturer whose reputation and success speak for themselves is a guarantee of success and innovation. McLaren will provide the engine, transmission and electronics for the cars being assembled by Spark Racing Technology.

The FIA Formula E Championship will be launched in 2014.

The press release waxes lyrical. It will run exclusively in major international cities and it has all the assets needed to reach a worldwide audience, becoming a bridge between the old and new era of industry and motorsport. Frédéric Vasseur (CEO, Spark Racing Technology): “I am proud and happy to give birth to this project that is innovative and extremely rewarding for a company both technically and philosophically. Personally, I can write a new chapter, regardless of my other ventures in motorsport. Confidence and commitment from our partner McLaren is a guarantee of quality and reliability without which this project would not have been possible. The association with a globally recognized car manufacturer is definitely the right way to go. Sport and society are evolving and Spark Racing Technology is proud to be the pioneer and leader in the new field of electric cars that will revolutionize the motor racing industry and attitude.”

You can only hope that Martin Whitmarsh (Team principal, Vodafone McLaren Mercedes) had his tongue in his cheek: “I’m a passionate believer in the role that motorsport can play in showcasing and spearheading the development of future technologies, and regard the Formula E concept as an exciting innovation for global motorsport. McLaren has worked with Frédéric Vasseur for many years, and our association has been very successful. Working together in Formula E, McLaren’s world-class technology and Spark Racing Technology’s expert knowledge will combine to allow both companies to stay at the forefront of technical innovation and hopefully open up great opportunities for the racing cars of tomorrow.”

Or maybe not. Thought of a London Grand Prix in 1981 for Sunday Magazine