Lanchester luxury

Often thought luxury cars too big. Lanchester showed 65 years ago that you could have a small luxury saloon, as well-appointed as a big one, just as quiet and every bit as classy. That was when Aston Martins were 2litres and Jaguars a bit big at 3½. Cars fitted roads and 200mph was what they used to do at Daytona Beach. Lancia Aprilias handled beautifully; you didn’t need big cars with huge engines.
Automotive News Europe’s Paul McVeigh says competition for luxury car sales is going to be decided by who does the best small premium cars. “Current No. 1 BMW believes its new front-wheel-drive architecture will give it a competitive edge against Audi and Mercedes-Benz.” BMW will go front wheel drive in its next 1-series. The current 1-series is rear wheel drive, but it has not a lot of legroom in the back so it is likely to follow the Mini and go front-drive.
BMW’s fwd architecture, known as ULK (somebody at BMW might tell us why ULK) is likely to be key. BMW executives hear complaints from traditional zealots that fwd dilutes BMW's rear-wheel-drive heritage. Klaus Draeger, BMW's head of purchasing, who helped create UKL when he was head of r&d, said that by 2020 it expects to make a lot of fwd models. Automotive News quoted him: "We are entering into new segments and getting new customers who learn you can drive very well with front-wheel drive.”
BMW’s Concept Active Tourer shown at Paris in September previewed BMW's first major model with UKL. A production version is due next September as a rival to Mercedes B class and Volkswagen Golf Plus. It's not greenery yallery to look askance at over-large cars. They're fine in America or Russia but there is a place here for the compact, refined, manageable and medium-sized.

Luddite IAM

Anybody in 1960 would have been, at best, cautious about landing aircraft in fog. Yet blind landings are now routine, pilotless aircraft roam the skies, and the Institute of Advanced Motorists (IAM) looks Luddite over driverless cars. Two people in five, the IAM says, would never have one and, if you believe the poll, most don’t even think they're a good idea.

Well, of course they don’t. Any more than airline passengers believed that a keen chap at the front of their BEA Trident was better than a pesky machine.

It took decades to convince passengers they were safer with clever gadgets than pilots who couldn’t see where they were going. It may be a decade or two before driverless cars, but satellite navigation and computers, not even invented when the Trident’s avionics did the job, have put the technology in place. Driverless cars are running. They’ve done hundreds of thousands of miles.

The 1960s Trident had an automatic blind landing system developed by Hawker Siddeley and Smiths Aircraft Instruments, which guided aircraft during approach, flare, touchdown and even roll-out from the landing runway. It enabled a Trident to perform the first automatic landing by a civil airliner in scheduled passenger service on 10 June 1965. The first genuinely blind landing in scheduled passenger service was on 4 November 1966.

The incentive was commercial. Airlines wanted to fly even when it was foggy. There will come a time somewhere, America, China perhaps, when a motorway will have driverless cars and trucks. It will run beautifully and safely. IAM members will be left on their own, driving themselves on minor roads, feeling their old-fashioned archaic way, very slowly.

Beware

If Camden Council, The Guardian and the Lib-Dems agree on something it is almost certainly restrictive, dirigiste and mistaken. They are campaigning for 20mph speed limits. The European Citizen’s Initiative is praising councils calling for 20mph, “for residential streets with populations,” and no, I don’t know what that means either. Sounds like the woolly thinking of self-serving populists.

Nobody is against measures that reduce casualties yet the overwhelming evidence is that simply posting notices and passing laws do not always work. As recently as August the Department of Transport said casualties in 20mph zones had gone up, while those on 30mph roads had gone down. Portsmouth brought in a blanket 20mph limit in 2007. The numbers of killed and injured went up from 79 to 143.

The fact is that drivers don’t pay attention and pedestrians are complacent in “Twenty’s Plenty” zones. The behaviour of neither is commendable but laying down a law is not going to change things. Let’s go instead for what works, and the 85 percentile rule by and large does. Speed limits based on what 85 per cent of traffic thinks is about right, means that 85 per cent of it complies and the 15 per cent that don’t can be weeded out and punished. It is practical, it has been the rule since urban speed limits were brought in under the 1930 Road Traffic Act, and despite increasing traffic ever since, casualties have been steadily decreasing. We must have been doing something right. Let us not allow Camden Council, The Guardian and the Lib-Dems to make a mess now.
A 20mph zone for a 1933 Vauxhall Light Six. Does anybody recognise the road? It looks like Rest-and-be-Thankful (on which restorative work seems to be once again delayed) but it might be somewhere in Wales. I doubt our family Vauxhall of the time HS 8635 if my memory serves me, ever made it to Campbeltown but if it had, this is the road it would have taken.

Fair cop


“The Council of the London Borough of Ealing believes that a penalty charge is payable for an alleged traffic contravention…” It was quite right. I knew when I stopped on that box junction that I shouldn’t. I had driven round the block after spotting number one daughter crossing the road. I was afraid she would dart into Lidl’s and disappear. I expected the white van to clear the junction but it didn’t. I dislike snooping cameras but you couldn’t argue with this one. It had video if I tried to argue, and I suspect the Council wouldn’t be impressed with catching number one daughter. I should have been paying more attention. I won’t do it again.

Rest and be Thankful


This 1753 military road corkscrewing up Glen Croe is hastily being remade to take traffic when the "new" A83 of the 1940s is closed by landslips. Since 2007 the gently graded modern highway (top left of picture), gateway to the west Highlands, has been blocked five times by thousands of tons of soggy peat and rock, causing 60-mile diversions. Over £16million has been spent already, and the old speed hill-climb course is being brought back into use as a stop-gap. Rest and be Thankful was a British Hill-Climb Championship course in the 1950s on which Raymond Mays competed with his black ERA and Jim Clark drove his Triumph TR2. In disrepair it was used as a rally special stage into the 1960s. In the RSAC Scottish Rally my co-driver Graham Birrell set a thoroughly competitive time in our works-loaned Ford Cortina GT. picture: Ricard Harvey Wikipedia

Red tape and the DVLA

The AA is over-excited about plans to stop the check for insurance when you apply for a tax disc. “Absurd” the AA calls it and on the face of it, so it looks, until you take the trouble to read what the DVLA says. I don’t much care for consultation documents by government departments that have obviously made up their mind what they’re going to do, but I decided to go through all 3579 words. There is, as you would expect, a lot of wasted verbiage like para 2, “The DVLA handles more than 200 million interactions each year and constantly reviews the processes that support these transactions to find more effective ways of working. The proposal to remove the insurance check when taxing a vehicle supports this aim in providing improvements to customer experience and delivering sustainable, long-term savings in line with the Government’s commitment to digital services and information sharing.” Pure window-dressing, but the DVLA has a point. “…the check at the point of taxing only ensured that there was a valid insurance policy in place on the day that the tax disc came into force. There was nothing in place to stop the applicant cancelling their insurance the next day and driving until their tax expired without valid insurance, albeit with the risk of Police enforcement proceedings.” There is now an electronic check of all insured vehicles in the UK (Motor Insurance Database (MID)) when an application for a tax disc is made through the DVLA’s Electronic Vehicle Licensing (EVL) system, which I guess most people use nowadays. Before an application is processed online, there is a check of the MID to confirm a valid policy is in place. There is also now Continuous Insurance Enforcement (CIE), which targets evaders and allows DVLA to identify uninsured drivers in ways not possible hitherto. Instead of spotting uninsured vehicles on the road, CIE discovers offenders by comparing the DVLA record of vehicle keepers with the MID. The AA claims the change will, “… send out the wrong message and undo much the work carried out by the Motor Insurers’ Bureau, the Government and the insurance industry.” The DVLA says it would save £1.2million a year and cut out red tape. It is probably right. The AA is still living in a dark age when real people went along to a real motor taxation office with a real insurance certificate and Gave Their Word.