James Bond's Bentley

Ian Fleming, Studebaker Avanti, supercharged Bentleys and Mercedes-Benzes, and Donald Healey feature in the latest Dove Digital anthology,

The Complete Bentley now available as an ebook THE COMPLETE BENTLEY.

. Fleming appears in connection with Healey, once owned a Studebaker Avanti I road tested for

The Motor

, and he memorably covered the 1930 Le Mans 24 Hours race. The great duel between Bentley and Mercedes-Benz was so seared into Fleming's memory that he re-created it for James Bond.

Individuals who gave their names to cars, Rolls and Royce, Ferrari, McLaren and Healey tended to be clever publicists. Competition driver and Technical Director of Triumph well before Austin-Healey days, Healey gained outright victory in the 1931 Monte Carlo Rally as well as winnning six Alpine Cups, for outstanding performances in the International Alpine Rally.

Healey drove an Invicta in the 1932 Alpine, taking as co-driver a young news agency reporter.

My World of Cars

(Haynes Publishing, 1994) was a biography Healey wrote with Peter Garnier: “On one of the Alpine Trials I did with Invicta, I had Ian Fleming, later of James Bond fame, with me as navigator. At the time, he was with Associated Press, and had been sent with me to report the event. On many subsequent occasions, when I used to cross the Atlantic three or four times a year on the Queen Mary or Queen Elizabeth, we would meet and recall our rally together. We started from Friedrichshaven, where the Graf Zeppelin was based, and one of the awards for a Glacier Cup was a free flight. We returned to Friedrichshaven for a 4am start, when there was no wind. It took 250 men to launch and land it, the only way to bring it down to earth being to fly it to within 50 feet or so of the ground and then release 250 ropes, which were grabbed by the landing party, who pulled the whole thing down on to a big, flat railway truck and made it fast. While in flight, we were able to buy postcards illustrating the Zeppelin, already stamped and franked with its own special postmark. I bought several of these to send home to the family and, when we were flying low over the post office square in Breganz, in Austria, a bag containing our mail was jettisoned, the cards being sent on to their various destinations. Ian, as a very young man on his first foreign assignment, obtained some valuable copy and it started in him an interest in cars that lasted right through his life, prompting him to buy the most exotic he could find. For me the flight was not without a few misgivings, for it was the year following the tragic loss of Britain’s R101 in northern France, on her flight from Cardington to India, with the loss of all but six of the 54 people on board.”

Fleming may have been with AP then, although he was certainly with Reuters on June 21-22 1930. From

The Complete Bentley

: “Ian Fleming, creator of James Bond, and a Commander RNVR in naval intelligence during the Second World War, witnessed Bentley’s fifth Le Mans win. Covering the race on assignment for Reuter’s news agency, Fleming watched the contest between the 6½ Litre Speed Six of Woolf Barnato and Glen Kidston, against the Teutonic splendour of the 7.1 litre SS Mercedes-Benz driven by Rudolph Caracciola and Christian Werner. Fleming was fascinated by the drama of the occasion. Even though it was an unequal struggle, the great white racer with its wailing supercharger and the basso profundo green Bentleys, made a deep impression on the young author. Six of them were ranged against the lone Mercedes until 2.30am when it retired. Fleming replayed the duel in Moonraker, when Bond’s 1930 4½ litre Bentley engaged in a thrilling chase with villain Hugo Drax’s Mercedes. Only treachery led to the Bentley being wrecked. Superchargers fascinated Fleming, and he enjoyed a long friendship with C Amherst Villiers, who engineered them.”

You would have thought that with family money and a good income from the Bond books, Ian Fleming might have acquired a better taste in cars. In 1954 he had an Armstrong Siddeley, nothing wrong with that, my father had one in 1956. There was a Ford Thunderbird in Fleming’s garage at one time, but then took leave of his senses and had a Studebaker Avanti. This was a particularly disagreeable car. Not, perhaps, the worst I drove on the road test staff of

The Motor

(that distinction went to a Fairthorpe Electron) but close. The axle tramp was like a nightmare Morris Minor 1000. It took extraordinary leaps and bounds on acceleration and braking, no matter how reverentially you treated brake and throttle. Everything seemed seriously out of balance. Even though the passage of time has softened Raymond Leowy’s lines, it can be imagined how bizarre the appearance was in 1964.

The family Armstrong Siddeley Sapphire 236.

The Avanti road test was never completed. I had drafted it three weeks before the Studebaker Corporation stopped making Avantis, so it only made the pages of the magazine on 29 January 1964 as Lament for a Road Test That Never Was. It had been a bad time for American car makers; Studebaker was the latest old name to vanish, following Hudson and Packard into history. There had been trouble with the Avanti’s plastics body, so when Studebaker abandoned car production in the United States, retaining only its Canadian assembly plant, the Avanti had to go.

Under “Handling and brakes” I wrote: “Even on dry roads, the Avanti was not a particularly pleasant car to drive because of the change of attitude it adopted when you applied power on a corner. In the wet, the throttle had to be used very sparingly or the back quickly became uncontrollable, the vast power generating copious wheelspin, even in top gear. Alarming, not to say dangerous, even for quite experienced drivers.

The original Avanti report described the understeer (the weight distribution was 59/41) commenting that although twisty roads could be taken at a cracking pace in the dry, “fast bends were all too often taken in a series of jerks as steering lock, throttle and then opposite lock were applied in quick succession.”

The steering was heavy and driving slowly over bumps there was a lot of kick-back. As with another very fast American we tested recently, there seemed to be a case for tyres with better wet grip. And the injunction, contained on a little plate inside the glove compartment, that the tyres were only for “ordinary motoring” did little for the driver’s peace of mind on motorways.”

The “other fast American” was a Chevrolet Corvette Sting Ray, which also features in Eric Dymock Originals to be published at the end of August.

Dove Digital: The Complete Bentley


Full-colour ebook edition of the luxury hardback that gained the author's second Montagu Award in 2009. The only single publication giving details of every Bentley model since the first in 1920.

This account of Bentley history and exhaustive chronology goes back to WO Bentley's early days as a scion of a wealthy North London family, so fascinated by railway locomotives that he took a premium apprenticeship with the Great Northern works at Doncaster. Commissioned into the Royal Naval Air Service in the 1914-1918 war, he created the Bentley rotary aero engine for fighter aircraft on the Western Front. His adventure into high-quality cars, which brought Bentley Motors a unique series of Le Mans victories, produced a dynasty of classics but ended in financial disaster. Rolls-Royce took over in 1930. The reputation of Bentleys never faltered; by the turn of the century ownership by Volkswagen AG brought new engineering achievements and another Le Mans triumph under the generalship of Ferdinand Porsche's grandson, the gifted Ferdinand Piëch.

Kindle edition ISBN 978-0-9554909-9-6, price £8.99, includes pictures.
Ebook (Adobe Digital) edition ISBN 978-0-9554909-6-5, price £15.99 – colour pictures throughout. Publisher: Dove Publishing Ltd.

Targa Siciliana by Camargue


Rolls-Royce must have had a Mafia mole. Briefly in 1975, Sicilian speed limits, it seemed, were suspended. We flew in a BAC 111 from Gatwick to Catania on January 15, for the press launch of the Camargue; driving round island roads in a sort of luxury Targa Florio*. Sicily was good in January, warm, sunny and we stayed at a spectacular hotel, clinging to a cliff in Taormina, Mount Etna one side and the Ionian Sea on the other. I drove with Roger Bell, an engineer from Rolls-Royce in the back. We never discovered if he was merely an observer, watching over his car or over us. We drove on dry, dusty mountain roads, then raced along empty half-finished Autostradas, which pierced rock faces with twin tunnels. It was an exciting journey in air conditioned comfort, the motorway bits mile after mile at an indicated 120mph. We weren’t sure that the man from Rolls-Royce enjoyed it, but he never complained. Roger was head road tester and a trusted former colleague at The Motor, an accomplished saloon car racer we often drove on press launches. We knew one another’s driving. The poor engineer didn’t know us at all.

Did you know there was a Bentley Camargue? Just one. A Bentley Pininfarina designed for Lord Hanson in 1967 and the Rolls-Royce Camargue eight years later, were not highly regarded at first. It was a decade or two later before the eye caught up with their high waistlines and flat sides. Sergio Pininfarina had worked to strict limits. His design brief from Crewe was unlike the free-ish hand given him for the Fiat 130 Coupe, which, as with the 1947 Cisitalia, was an exemplar of crisp contour and elegant proportions. This time he had to adhere to the 1960s T-series/Silver Shadow floor pan, engine and transmission. Furthermore he was required to keep the generous seating plan. Rolls-Royce decreed that the proportions of the radiator could change (they had altered several times since 1904) and, as a special concession it could be tilted forwards, but by no more than 4 degrees from the vertical. Camargue looked bigger than the rest of the range and although no taller, it was a substantial 10cm (3.94in) wider. A striking innovation to the facia was Pininfarina’s clever adoption of aircraft-style instrument bezels, at one stroke taking the ambience of the car ahead by a generation. Something of a new experience for Crewe was meeting safety legislation, largely American thus far, which required destructive testing of bodies and components. More power was needed to make sure the larger frontal area would not affect performance, so after car 31 the engine was supplied with a German-made Solex four-barrel fixed choke carburettor. For markets where stringent emissions regulations were being applied, such as the United States and Japan, the two SUs were retained along with a lower compression ratio of 7.3:1. Crewe and Mulliner Park Ward in London shared Camargue production until summer 1968, when Motor panels of Coventry was contracted to supply completed body shells and production commenced at Crewe. Prototype Camargues ran with Bentley disguises and a turbocharged Bentley had been considered for production, but the car came on the market as a Rolls-Royce. However Sir David Plastow said that the company would be happy to quote a price for a Bentley version if anyone wanted. It was an offer one customer took up. Enquiries to identify the individual came to nothing. Was there a Sicilian connection?
INTRODUCTION 1975 produced to 1986
BODY Saloon; 2-doors, 4-seats; weight 2347kg (5175lb)
ENGINE V8-cylinders, in-line; front; 101.4mm x 99.1mm, 6750cc; compr 9:1 later 8:1; 164kW (220bhp) @ 4000rpm; 24.3kW (32.57bhp)/l.
ENGINE STRUCTURE 2 pushrod overhead valves; hydraulic tappets; gear-driven central cast iron camshaft; aluminium cylinder head with steel valve seats, aluminium block, cast iron wet cylinder liners; 4-choke Solex 4A1 carburettor, later 2 SU HIF7 1.87in; coil ignition Lucas Opus electronic ignition distributor; two SU electric fuel pumps; 5-bearing chrome molybdenum crankshaft.
TRANSMISSION rear wheel drive; GM400 3-speed automatic with torque converter; hypoid bevel final drive 3.08:1.
CHASSIS steel monocoque with sub-frames; independent single transverse arm top wishbone front suspension; coil springs, anti roll bar; independent trailing arm rear suspension, coil springs; anti roll bar; rear automatic height control; telescopic dampers; hydraulic servo brakes, 27.9cm (11in) dia discs, 2 single callipers front ventilated, dual calliper rear; triple circuit; Saginaw recirculating ball, later rack and pinion PAS; 107l (23.5gal) fuel tank; 235 70VR 15 radial ply tyres, 6in rims
DIMENSIONS wheelbase 305cm (120in); track front 152.4cm (60in), rear 151.4cm (59.6in); length 517cm (203.5in); width 191.8cm (75.5in); height 148cm (58.2in); ground clearance 16.5cm (6.5in); turning circle 11.6m (38ft).
EQUIPMENT Connolly hide upholstery; Wilton carpet with nylon rugs; air conditioning; laminated windscreen; Bosch Frankfurt AM FM radio £77.46 extra
PERFORMANCE maximum speed 190kph (118mph); 42.1kph (26.2mph) @ 1000rpm;
0-100kph (62mph) 10.1sec; fuel consumption 22.6l/100km (12.5mpg).
PRICE, 1975 Rolls-Royce £29,250
PRODUCTION 525 Rolls-Royces and 1 Bentley (plus 4 prototypes and 4 experimental cars all scrapped)
*Sicilian road race. This blog based on The Complete Bentley, Dove Publishing Ltd, now widely available as an ebook from Foyles, Waterstone, Amazon and more.

WO Bentley's aero engines


Walter Owen (WO) Bentley was into aero engines and railway locomotives long before he gave his name to cars. The Bentley BR2 was described by aviation authority Bill Gunston as the pinnacle of the rotary aircraft engine and the Sopwith Snipe and Camel, which used it, as the best Allied fighter aircraft. Nearly 500 Snipes were built in 1918, a total of 1,567 were delivered to the Royal Air Force, as well as a ground attack version, the Sopwith Salamander. Snipes with Bentley rotaries remained in service until November 1926.

Known first as the Admiralty Rotary (AR1), then BR for Bentley Rotary it used similar valvegear to the troublesome French Clerget it replaced, but little else, and WO was upset by allegations that his engine was no more than an imitation. “These (claims) originated from people who glanced only at the cam mechanism, which was the first thing they saw and, for ease of production, was the only similar feature. The crankcase, crankshaft, method of securing the cylinders as well as their heads were all fundamentally different.”

1915-1919 BENTLEY AERO ENGINES

Commander Wilfred Briggs RN took charge of relations between aircraft engine manufacturers and the Royal Navy during the First World War. He created a department for the Royal Naval Air Service (RNAS), and in 1915 appointed Lieutenant WO Bentley RNVR to its Technical Board looking into troubles with rotary engines. Rotaries, in which the cylinders spun round the crankshaft, had been developed by the Société des Moteurs Gnome in 1908. Carefully made in nickel steel they were expensive, but they were also light, and since the entire engine spun like a flywheel behind the propeller they ran smoothly. The cylinders of a rotary, to which the propeller was attached, rotated around a fixed crankshaft so the leading edge of the cylinder barrel was invariably better cooled than the trailing edge. As a result the bores went oval, the piston rings broke and the engines suffered catastrophic seizures. Gwynnes Pumps of Chiswick, which was making them was unhappy with WO’s suggestions to deal with the difficulties so Briggs suggested trying them out on a single sample cylinder with encouraging results. Gwynnes was worried about making changes, in case they compromised its licensing agreement with Clerget, and turned them down.

Other drawbacks included overhauls after only 20 hours and heavy oil consumption. Designed by Pierre Clerget in 1911, his Chiswick-made 9B had a better cylinder than the Gnome with deep cooling fins, and took mixture to the inlet valves through pipes instead of through the crankcase. It had dual ignition and was effective in Sopwith Camel and Nieuport fighters, notwithstanding the gyroscopic effects of the rotary engine. Each cost £907 10/-, but suffered failures of the obturator ring, an artillery term for the sealing ring of a gun breech, describing a flexible piston ring of thin bronze or light alloy, providing a seal when the 0.06in (1.5mm) thick cylinder wall distorted. The flimsy cylinders were stressed to the utmost as the tips reached 150mph (241kph) whirling round. The turbulent airstream cooled cylinders asymmetrically and failures were frequent. WO Bentley’s modifications increased power from 110bhp (82kW) to 130bhp (96.9kW) and improved reliability for a new version of the engine, which went into production as the AR (for Admiralty Rotary) and later BR (Bentley Rotary) made by Humber and Daimler. Bentley specified aluminium air-cooled cylinders with shrunk-in iron liners, redesigned the steel cylinder heads, secured them by four long bolts and to the Admirals’ delight made the engine for £605. The stroke was increased from the Clerget’s 6.7in (170.2mm), bringing the capacity to 1,055cu in (17,288cc). Some 150bhp (112kW) @ 1250rpm could be sustained for 100 hours between overhauls. Bentley made further improvements, then in April 1917 three prototypes of a fresh design were ordered, weighing only 93lb (42kg) more, yet with bigger cylinders and giving 200bhp (149kW) @ 1300rpm. Some 1,500 a month were planned, at £880 still well below the price of the troublesome Clerget. The new engine was designated BR2, and although it used similar valvegear, was a complete reincarnation of the old French engine, and the most powerful rotary in service.

Walter Owen Bentley (1888-1971)

INTRODUCTION BR1 1917; BR2 1917-1920s. weight 475lb (215.5kg) .
ENGINE 9-cylinders, radial rotary; 5.5in (140mm) x 7.1in (180mm), 1522cu.in (24,961cc); compr 5.3:1; 238bhp (177.5kW) @ 1300rpm; 9.56bhp (7.13kW)/l.
ENGINE STRUCTURE 2 overhead valves per cylinder operated by pushrods from epicyclic gears at front of crankcase; finned aluminium cylinders with cast iron liners, screwed into crankcase; forged steel cylinder heads; carburettor, dual ignition, fuel system; circular main bearing, master connecting rod on ball bearings, and eight slave rods wrist-pinned; air-cooled.
TRANSMISSION direct.
PERFORMANCE maximum speed 121mph (195.7kph) in Sopwith Snipe.
PRICE £880.
PRODUCTION WO claimed 30,000 were ordered. BR1 production started June 1917, Humber delivered 600, Vickers 523, total 1123. BR2 first ran October 1917, Crossley delivered 83, Daimler 1415, Gwynnes 82, Humber 391, Ruston & Proctor 596, total 2567

From: The Complete Bentley, by Eric Dymock

The Blue Train Bentley


Bruce and Jolene McCaw of Medina, Washington settled any doubts about which 6½ Litre Bentley beat the Blue Train. Following research. They bought both. Was it the fastback (above) or the saloon, pictured below in June 2006 Motor Sport?

1930 GURNEY NUTTING 6½ Litre BLUE TRAIN SPEED SIX
Notwithstanding Terence Cuneo’s well-known painting, there was some conjecture that the Blue Train from Cannes to Calais had been outpaced with a different car. Barnato referred to it only as “my Speed Six saloon”. The car in the Cuneo painting, GJ 3811 was commissioned by Barnato with a sweeping roofline, and one of the first ever fastbacks in which the rearmost seat was placed sideways. The rakish black (and later also dark olive) Gurney Nutting body had smart gadgetry, a cocktail cabinet, and reputedly accomplished the dramatic drive in March 1930 as a result of a wager in a gentlemen’s club. The Blue Train ran from Cannes to Calais, Barnato aiming not so much to beat it, as show how easily it could be done. The company needed all the publicity it could get, it was on the brink of receivership, and as principal shareholder he was fretting.

In reality the contest demanded neither great speed, nor exceptional staying power, except perhaps from the crew of the car. Barnato set off with his golfing friend Dale Bourn, not from the railway station at Cannes - that would have looked like a stunt - but from the bar at the Carlton. They waited for word that the Blue Train was departing, finished their drinks, and left. There were no autoroutes. Fuel was arranged in advance overnight, Esso filling stations remained open at Aix-en-Provence and Lyons, and a tanker lorry at Auxerre, while the train made its leisurely progress. From Cannes it went west along the Cote d’Azur, stopping for 70 minutes in Marseille, before heading North for Paris where it wasted three hours going from the Gare d’Orleans to the Gare du Nord. The Bentley pressed on without a pause, reaching Boulogne with an hour to spare before the ferry, and getting to London in time for a celebration drink at Bourn’s club, The Conservative, in St James’s Street. It was 3.20 on the London Victoria clock, according to Barnato, and the Blue Train was not due in Calais for another four minutes. The pair then parked outside the RAC in Pall Mall for the hall porter to stamp their cards having averaged 43.43mph (69.89kph).

Writing this in The Complete Bentley, I was careful to take into account a possibility that the Gurney Nutting fastback was not the car that took part. In 2006 Mike Cassell wrote in the Financial Times about a re-enactment, trying to clear up the confusion. After US businessman McCaw bought the Gurney Nutting coupé illustrated in Cuneo’s picture, research suggested that Barnato may have used his saloon 6½. The McCaws tracked this down from its chassis number, reuniting it with its original Mulliner saloon bodywork, which had been re-mounted on another chassis.

They then owned both. Mike Cassell’s re-enactment left the Carlton Hotel in Cannes before dawn, finding a sprinkling of snow on the mountain peaks of the Napoleonic route. They were not burdened with finding where Barnato’s pre-arranged refuelling stops were, nor did they suffer a puncture. However they did manage a meal and a decent night’s sleep near Dijon, completing the 750 miles in 37 hours against Barnato’s in 20hr 35min.

INTRODUCTION first registered May 1930
BODY Gurney Nutting Speed Six.
ENGINE 6-cylinders, in-line; front; 100mm x 140mm, 6597cc; compr 5.3:1; 180bhp (134.23kW) @ 3500rpm; 27.28bhp (20.34kW)/l.
ENGINE STRUCTURE 4-valves, double springs; 8-bearing camshaft, 3-throw coupling rod drive; cast iron cylinder block with stainless steel jacket plates; single port block; 2 vertical HVG5 SU carburettors; two Champion plugs per cylinder; Bosch magneto and Delco-Remy coil; Autovac fuel system; 8-bearing crankshaft, with damper; water-cooled
TRANSMISSION rear wheel drive; sdp clutch; 4-speed C-type gearbox, right hand change; spiral bevel final drive 3.53:1.
CHASSIS pressed steel frame 0.188in (4.77mm), 7 cross-members; semi-elliptic leaf springs; Bentley and Draper friction dampers; self-wrapping, Dewandre servo mechanical brakes, front Bentley-Perrot; 15.75in (40cm) drums; worm and sector steering; 25gal (113.6l) fuel tank; Dunlop tyres 21 x 6.00, rear 21 x 7.00; Rudge-Whitworth centre lock wire wheels.
DIMENSIONS wheelbase 140.5in (356.87cm); track 56in (142.2cm); length 187in (474.9cm); width 68.5in (173.99cm); ground clearance 7.25in (18.4cm); turning circle 47.5ft (14.5m).
EQUIPMENT Smith and Jaeger instruments, white figures black faces, German silver parallel-sided radiator shell; Green Label badges. Zeiss headlamps; Bosch electrics; Hobson fuel telegauge; brake vacuum gauge
PERFORMANCE maximum speed 92mph (147.7kph)-100mph (160.9kph); fuel consumption 15mpg (18.83l/100km).
PRICE chassis £1800.
Detail from Dove Publishing: The Complete Bentley

Always a winner, Woolf Barnato (right with Sir Tim Birkin) the only drivers to win all three Le Mans 24-Hours races he entered. This picture captioned "a quarter of an hour before the start, 1929."

Bentley GTC Speed

BENTLEY GTC SPEED


December. Just the month for testing convertibles. Managed it just before the snow. But the top remained shut throughout a 500 mile round trip to Chichester with not much chance of basking in anything beyond the reflected glory of a £153,400 masterpiece. Prodigious acceleration, braking, 600 horse power, it could do, the factory says, 200 miles an hour and nought to sixty in a trice.

The Bentley is exquisitely made, but 200 miles an hour? You have to think of it as a sort of engineering endorsement. My Rolex Oyster Perpetual GMT-Master is watertight in 200 metres of water. I do not expect to be looking at the time 200 metres down, but it is good to know that I could.

The GTC Speed is a 2485kg (5478lb) (49cwt or two and a half tons in old money) luxury cruiser with the agility of a Focus RS. Heavy items have a lot of momentum; they can be very unresponsive, but the Bentley’s poise is perfect. The steering is weighted perfectly. Body roll is negligible. Its precision is exemplary. Modern electronics have transformed cars like this. Both GTCs have Sport Traction, which calms down the Electronic Stability Program (ESP) to help feel and control. In Dynamic Mode the GTC Speed has a touch of extra wheel slip for quicker response. Continuous all-wheel drive has good traction in all weathers, transferring pull between front and rear through a sensitive differential in the middle. If it detects a difference in grip at either end, power goes to the wheels that have most.

The GTC is serene. A Bentley is scarcely understated although somehow it keeps its dignity. The Speed title was revived in 2007, recalling the Speed Six of 1929, a 6½ Litre of a mere 180 horse power, which was less than the 240 of the 4½ Litre with Amherst Villiers supercharger. Interestingly the 4½ weighed half a ton less than the modern GTC.

Aside from the name and reputation, there is something self-effacing about this most powerful Bentley Convertible ever. There is nothing flashy, just good proportions, perfect precision although with a small caveat emptor over the tastefulness of the test car. I never much cared for Bentley’s wavy netting radiator. It is supposed to look like the stoneguards required at Le Mans in the 1920s protecting the real radiator, even though the loose rock strewn track has long been replaced. When Bentley won again at the Circuit de la Sarthe in 2003, it was billiard table smooth so the netting is an anachronism. It should be discarded, together with the test car’s turned aluminium instrument panel.

I would go for one of the six natural unbleached laser-cut wood veneers. It is a matter of taste of course, on which you might need a gentleman’s gentleman, like Jeeves, to pass judgement. He would caution stiffly on the quilted diamond pattern upholstery, “Not really you, sir”. It looks louche, like the furniture, I am told, you get in certain types of boudoir. Prefer one of the 17 premium grade leathers perhaps in the new shade, Aquamarine. Probably live with the hand-stitched Bentley logo. Family escutcheons are probably passé.

Otherwise faultless? Not quite. You can feel and hear road bumps. It is fine on a smooth surface but serenity runs short on grainy concrete motorways. Expansion joints make a B-r-r-p. It is not easy designing suspension soft enough to cushion noise, yet firm enough to provide tenacity at 150mph. Jaguar manages it, so must Bentley.

Bentleys are splendidly engineered in Germany, but it looks as though Germans don’t feel they are getting their money’s worth unless tyres send frissons up their spines. The engine is made in Crewe. Dr Porsche’s grandson Ferdinand Piëch’s magnificent W12 with twin turbochargers is smooth and mostly near silent. It growls on acceleration, not a racy noise like an Aston Martin or Ferrari but the boom, perhaps, of a double bass rather than a clarinet of gears and tappets.

The 6-speed ZF automatic’s gearshifts are virtually imperceptible; even on Sport setting you can only tell from the tachometer or the small print on the instrument display, that you have moved a gear. Controlling the shifts from little paddles behind the wheel, like in a racing car, seems an affectation.

Fuel consumption? Depends how you drive. It is possible to get down to single-figure mpg but I was getting 27, using the adaptive cruise control that keeps your distance from the car in front, even when it slows unexpectedly. A tiny radar sensor notices everything. And so do I. Note to Bentley on extolling features of the GTC Speed, like its drilled alloy foot pedals: I once received a memo from an editor obsessed with brevity, “Foot pedal,” it said, “is one word too many.”