Road users


Tractor drivers not caravanners are the most despised. Top of my list are self-righteous gadflies who admonish you for not keeping to the left on motorways. I don't like inside undertakers, gesticulating show-offs, mobile phone users, cigarette smokers, unthinking signalers, especially those who flash left to show they are about to cut-in. Yet according to the compilers aggressive business drivers, motorway tail-gaters and boy racers should be listed and aren't. They are more likely to have high insurance premiums. I can think of plenty more such as BMW drivers, so belligerent that they get other BMW drivers, like me, a bad name. Tractors. A Fordson Super Dexta and a Fergie at a tractor rally on Bute.

Tractor drivers aren’t that bad. I get behind them on country lanes where I live, and I always feel that because they are so elevated and visible they get embarrassed by long queues. There used to be a rule in California (maybe there still is) that if you built up a train of more than six, that you had to pull in and let them past. Drivers towing caravans couldn’t see you. Even with extended mirrors there were none so blind.

Only this afternoon I had an old Mazda come up behind me on the A1M. I was in the big Nissan and sticking to a strict 77mph. It’s four lanes and I was in the second. There wasn’t much on the slow lane but I didn’t want to snake in and out, preferring a disciplined straight course. You could tell from the Mazda’s body language what was going to happen. He had to pull out from close behind to lane 3 to overtake, and immediately swerved to the left pointing and gesticulating.



Yet he was the miscreant. At 85 or 90mph HE was reprimanding ME. And off he went swerving from this lane to that, flashing madly. A show-off. He slowed down later. A phone call distracted him and when I overtook he had his mobile fixed on his ear. At least he had stopped being a nuisance although he was now more dangerous. I was always taught to look in the mirror before signaling, and if there was nobody to signal to, don’t. Now you see drivers frantically signaling as a sort of gesture, an unthinking rite, which they imagine entitles them to any swerve, change of pace or manoeuvre.


Let us have done with them. For the record, according to the survey results, the Top Five Most Hated Road Users are: 1. Tractor drivers; 2. Caravan owners; 3. Sunday drivers; 4. Learner drivers; 5. Cyclists. Sunday drivers? Surely not. I was one today.

CITROEN


The French have never been good at luxury cars. Citroën is about to make its last C6. The DS of 1956 was a phenomenon, but its hydropneumatic circuitry and aircraft-quality technology didn’t work in cars. I once had a Citroën collapse embarrassingly on a Scottish press launch.

About to take off from Heathrow, my British Midland Boeing 737 taxied back to its stand. "We will not be going to Glasgow on this aircraft," the captain apologised. "We have an instrument warning light, which forbids us taking off." He said it was tiresome, probably nothing, but rules were rules and would everybody please get off.

Passengers agreed warning lights were not to be ignored, and we set off in another aircraft to try Citroën's reply to the BMW 5-Series, a 24valve XM. The warning light was apparently connected to the aircraft’s hydraulics. It was not going to be a good day for hydraulics.

Oily fluid in pipes conveying pressure, pumping up air springs, gave the XM a floaty, matchless ride. Electronic sensors puffed up air bags working in conjunction with the hydraulics, keeping the car on an even keel the way Citroën invented in the 1950s. You barely gave hydraulic brakes and hydraulically-assisted steering a thought; they had been with us so long and there were always mechanical alternatives on which to fall back - steering by rack and pinion, a rod-and-cable handbrake.

The flagship Car of the Year XM had a V6 24-valve engine of 200 horse power, did 145mph, and reached 60mph in 7.5sec. It was well-proportioned, had alloy wheels, colour-matched bumpers, and luxury appointments such as electric seat adjustment, air conditioning and wood door cappings.

Half way through the test the power steering stiffened. On a couple of corners hydraulic assistance left off assisting, and the light feel grew leaden. When it gave up altogether it was just like driving a Citroën with very heavy steering; the car went where it was pointed and it was satisfying to know that when steering hydraulics failed, there was a mechanical system to take its place.

However, a Citroën's hydraulics failure was problematical. They were central its operation, and some 30 miles further on, the suspension sagged. A warning light came on and a buzzer sounded. The facia said STOP! With an exclamation mark. Citroën's hydraulics had stopped hydraulicking. This warning light, unlike the Boeing’s, meant what it said.

A drive belt, the Citroën PR man claimed, had come off. The pump for the hydraulic pressure was pumping no more and the car decided that, although most things were still functioning, pressing on with the suspension in a state of collapse was not an option. Citroën found me a replacement; we were air-and-fluid-borne once more, completing the journey through the Highlands in the serene comfort of a top Mercedes-Benz or Rolls-Royce.

The 1956 DS had tempted buyers away from Mercedes-Benz, but in the 21st century Citroën finds itself unable to make the C6 compete with premium brands, principally German. Only 556 were sold in Europe in the first 10 months of this year, so it has stopped. Peugeot also has quit the large luxury market so French consumers looking for premium saloons will need to buy BMW, Audi, Mercedes-Benz or, quelle horreur, a Jaguar. Renault makes the Latitude, but buyers in France are not buying it because it is a rebadge of the Samsung SM5, imported from South Korea. Up to October, Renault sold 3,792 Latitudes, a decline of almost 60 percent from last year.

Renault might develop a new flagship with the underpinnings of a Mercedes E-class, selling as the Initiale Paris sub-brand. Automotive News Europe is not alone in wondering whether Renault should follow Peugeot and Citroën and leave the big luxury segment to the BMW 5-series (101,600 sales in Europe after 10 months); the Audi A6 (89,300); and the Mercedes-Benz E-class (86,400). In Europe, this market segment speaks principally German. The end of the rainbow for the C6.




Continous history: Maserati


As important for a classic make as a classic car. Provenance is as vital for selling a Vintage Maserati and it is for selling new Maseratis. It helps if it is shown to be uninterrupted. Cars lost in barns or broken up and rebuilt, perhaps not well, have gaps in their provenance. It is just the same with long-established Maserati. Being in and out of receivership, like Aston Martin was, doesn’t matter, so much as the effect changes in ownership had.

Maserati’s ambition, announced yesterday, to make 50,000 cars a year looks unlikely at best. It was doing quite well when production reached 6365 in 1984 and Chrysler bought a 5 per cent stake against a design contract. It is unrealistic to expect resuscitation of a make with a chequered history that last saw chequered flags half a century ago.
The Maserati brothers were into racing cars. Carlo (b1881), Bindo (b1883), Alfieri (b1887), Ernesto (b1898) and Ettore (b1894) were obsessional. There was a sixth brother, Mario, who went off to be an artist (he designed the trident badge, seen left) but the others created Officine Alfieri Maserati SpA in Bologna in 1926. Alfieri led the project to make good an existing Diatto project that had effectively failed. It was the 1930s before they saw real success, then in 1932 Alfieri died leaving Ernesto to take over design. He was so successful that Maseratis became the racing car of choice for private sportsmen, even replacing Bugattis.

The brothers were bought out in 1938 by Commendatore Adolfo Orsi. He wanted to use the racing heritage to sell road cars, and moved the factory from Bologna to Modena. There was not much chance of making much of things until 1947, when the 6-cyl 1488cc Tipo A6 appeared at Geneva with a Pinin Farina body. The brothers meanwhile, released from their obligations not to make racing cars left, setting up OSCA, the Officina Specializzata Costruzione Automobili Bologna, leaving Orsi to make road cars with a racing pedigree, like Ferrari.

The brothers left Orsi with the so-called San Remo 4CLT/48, their last design, which turned out to be one of the best racing cars of the time. The later 250F remains an all-time classic, but in 12 years ORSI only made 138 A6 road cars. Quality was a problem and Orsi never managed to get the mix quite right. In 1957 Maserati nearly won the world sports car championship and Fangio (above)took the drivers’ title in a 250F but the Commendatore was running out of money in Argentina. He got Giulio Alfiero to design a new road car to make good his losses and a 3500GT dohc 6-cyl had some 250F features and a ZF gearbox. Up to about 1964 it was selling as well as any Ferrari.

Maserati sports-racing cars were doing well and sales of the 3500GT improved. In all 2223 3500GTs were sold but in the later 1960s racing successes declined and road car derivatives Ghibli, Quattroporte, and Mexico were expensive. They could be quirky and sometimes not very well made. I remember road testing a noisy, overheated and unmanageable Mistrale. Quirkiness continued with the co-operative hydro-pneumatic Citroën SM V6, which achieved the distinction of featuring in polls for both The Best Cars of the 20th century and The Worst.

I road tested a Merak, one of the first mid-engined road-going coupes, photographing it at Thruxton. I wote: The Merak, based on Maserati’s first mid-engined road car has some fruits of Maserati’s relationship with Citroën. These include the V6 from the SM, developed from Maserati’s own V8, which means it has a theoretically unsatisfactory angle of 90 degrees between the cylinder banks; it is in effect the V8 with two cylinders chopped off.
So much for the background to a beautiful car. Inside, it is trimmed with leather, two large comfortable seats in the front, two rather small and barely practical Plus Twos in the rear, better thought of as luggage space, although there is a quite reasonable boot compartment at the front.


If you have never driven a mid-engined car, the Merak’s cornering is breathtaking. The balance and response is superb and the ride smoothes out the faster one goes. Likewise, the acceleration (0-60mph a fraction over 7.5sec) is outstanding, and the top speed is comfortably over twice the legally permitted maximum. Under the circumstances, fuel consumption in the region of 18-20 mpg is hardly surprising.
With so much elegance and Italian brio about it, the Maserati Merak is certainly one of the world’s great classic cars, and will be treasured in years to come amongst the all- time greats. But that is not to say it is perfect. It inherits Citroën brakes, which require needless delicacy in a car where they sometimes have to be pressed decisively. The decor is a mite old fashioned, and the gearchange rather slow. Compared with the Jaguar XJS it comes off badly in ride, quietness and general refinement; it is no more expensive and it has little real gains to offer in handling or speed. Against the slightly more expensive Porsche 928 it is definitely of the 1970s rather than the 1980s, but plenty of keen drivers with some £19,000 to spend may not think that is altogether a disadvantage.

Maserati made 1832 Meraks between 1972 and 1983 but Khamsins, Boras and more Quattroportes were disappointing and Citroën, now owner 38.2 per cent by Peugeot, nearly closed it down to cut its losses. Despite body designs by some of the best Italian design houses, Maserati atrophied. Alejandro de Tomaso came along and bought the firm for his industrial empire, with the aid of an Italian government grant. Engines became ever bigger, 4.1litre, 4.9litre and then Bi-turbo. It looked a bit desperate.


Maserati was never going to do well in production and in 1993 sold out to Fiat, which invested $170million and closed the factory for re-tooling. It sold half to Ferrari SpA, claiming Maserati would expand to be, “Italy’s Jaguar.” A new 3.2litre twin-turbo V8 came out in 1998. It had a body by Giugiaro, could do nearly 170mph and was a challenger to the Aston Martin DB7. Fiat’s new commitment is $1.6billion for three new models that will share Chrysler platforms and sell through 2300 Chrysler US dealers. The aim is to increase sales from last year’s 6159 to 50,000 in 2015.

It expects the Quattroporte, based on a Chrysler 300 with a Ferrari-made engine to lead the field, with 13,000 sales next year. It has a choice of 3litre V6 or 3.8 V8 and will cost around €150,000 ($193,000) against the €141,000 Porsche Panamera Turbo. It will be followed by other new Maseratis over the next four years, including a Levante SUV and a small saloon Ghibli, which will also share components with the Chrysler 300 and compete with Mercedes-Benz E-class and BMW 5-series.

Likely? Probably not. When banks had managers, you could see optimistic car companies trying to claim business was good. They would parade new cars at expensive launches in Nice or elsewhere to get good reports in the papers, which made the company creditworthy. Often you came away thinking, “They haven’t a hope.” Now car makers like Fiat CEO Sergio Marchionne have to convince analysts, governments, official groups, monetarists, not to mention broken and dispirited bankers that the impossible is achievable.

Alas, it’s not. It is tempting for Fiat to increase premium-priced luxury-car sales but they will fall short. One Automotive News Europe forecast is for Maserati delivering 28,100 cars in 2015, 44 per cent short of its 50,000. “Maserati has the right reputation and consumers are out there for more premium cars, especially in the U.S. and China,” says Neil King, an analyst at Euromonitor International. “But their target is incredibly ambitious.” Repeat – incredible.


MGenesis.


A Centenary approaches. It depends where you start counting. Worcester-born William Richard Morris (1877-1963) set up a bicycle-making business in 1893 at James Street, Cowley St John. In 1902 he made motorcycles and opened a bicycle dealership with premises at 48 High Street Oxford and 100 Holywell Street, known as Longwall. The 1903 partnership, the Oxford Automobile and Cycle Agency, at 16 George Street, George Street Mews, New Road, Longwall and 48 High Street failed and he had to borrow to buy back its tools. He decided never to enter a partnership again.

He resumed business at 48 High Street and in 1907 expanded into the car side at Longwall. By 1910 the premises were grandly titled the Oxford Motor Palace and 48 High Street was disposed of to Edward Armstead. In October 1912 WRM Motors was established with £4,000 capital from the Earl of Macclesfield and in November Morris showed the Morris Oxford design to Gordon Stewart of Stewart and Ardern. He was so taken with it that he agreed to buy 400. Morris was now sole proprietor of The Morris Garages in Longwall, Queen Street, and St Cross Road Oxford.

On 29 March 1913 the first Morris Oxford was built at Temple Cowley. It had a body by Raworth, engine and gearbox by White & Poppe, axles by EG Wrigley, and a bull-nose radiator made by Doherty Motor Components. (top right, the bull nose)

An MG car proper was still a world war and ten years away (above left), but its ingredients were already in place.

March 29 2013 for MG was “In the beginning…” The Genesis of MG should surely be celebrated. (below) 1930s classic Jaguar rival, MG SA Tickford Coupe


Anniversary


Press launch 30 years ago this week. We drove the Mazda 626 on a banked test track; a decent enough car but scarcely worth crash helmets and long press conferences. We went everywhere by Bullet train. Here’s Michael Kemp (centre) motoring correspondent of The Daily Mail talking to Australian newcomer Steve Cropley. Behind them is Roy Spicer (Sunday Mirror) and Anthony Curtis (Motor). On the right are Clifford Webb (The Times) and Sue Baker (Evening News). That’s Sue with John Ebenezer, Mazda’s MD, and Hugh Hunston of The Glasgow Herald pretending to be brave. Cliff Webb is by the Bullet train’s speedo reading.







Good news or bad news


BBC gloomsters have been so intent on telling us we are going to have a triple dip recession that they completely failed to say the UK has become Europe's second-biggest car market. After a lifetime listening to news and current affairs from our national broadcaster I now turn to others, Sky for example, for an objective view. Today, the World at One and PM are worst on radio, BBC TV News 24 not much better. Today was blabbing on about climate change again this morning. It was parroting all the customary lines on rising sea levels, the west’s collective shame about polluting the planet, and how we should be compensating the rest of the world.
Good news is anathema on the liberal left BBC. There was no applause for November’s new car sales in Britain increasing 5.4 per cent to 1.92 million. No comparisons with France collapsing 13.8 per cent to 1.73 million. Europe's biggest market, Germany, fell 2 per cent to 2.88 million. The UK rise, according to Paul Everitt CEO of the SMMT, was down to private retail customers. Demand for small cars showed better than average growth for the 11th month.

In November UK sales rose 11.3 per cent to 149,191 while French fell 19.2 per cent to 144,694 and German dropped 3 per cent to 260,000. The Ford Fiesta has been top seller here so far this year, but demand also has been high for the Focus, the best-selling new car in November.
Jaguar Land Rover welcomed David Cameron to Solihull site for a brief tour of its new customer handover centre where he was shown the first new Range Rover that will be exported to India. He said: “Jaguar Land Rover's continued success, and rising exports, demonstrates the strength of the automotive sector in the UK, and the crucial role this industry plays in growing and rebalancing the economy.”
Time somebody pointed out the good news.